OpenCritic Tells A Slightly Brighter Story
The Adventures of Elliot OpenCritic listing is useful because it shows both the average and the recommendation spread. In the June 24, 2026 local crawl, OpenCritic listed an 82 Top Critic Average, an 86% Critics Recommend rate, and a Strong label. Live search results for the same day showed 78 critic reviews and the same overall average band.
That is a clearer endorsement than a single platform Metacritic number. It says most critics recommend the game, even if many reviews still name the same flaws.
Score Snapshot
| OpenCritic Field | June 24 Snapshot | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Top Critic Average | 82 | Strong positive consensus |
| Critics Recommend | 86% | Most tracked critics lean recommend |
| Critic Reviews | 78 | Broad enough for a stable early picture |
| Label | Strong | OpenCritic’s qualitative band |
Scores can change as late reviews arrive, so this page should be refreshed before using exact numbers in evergreen marketing copy. The broader conclusion is stable: OpenCritic presents Elliot as a strong, recommended action RPG, not a divisive miss.
Why OpenCritic Can Differ From Metacritic
OpenCritic aggregates across outlets differently and does not split the main impression by platform in the same way a platform-specific Metacritic page does. That can make the OpenCritic number feel cleaner for a general buyer, while Metacritic may be more useful if you only care about one platform.
Use both:
| If You Need | Better Source To Check |
|---|---|
| Overall critic mood | OpenCritic |
| Platform-specific score bands | Metacritic |
| Detailed review quotes | Individual reviews |
| Performance and patch state | Current player reports |
| Purchase decision | Demo plus review themes |
What The Review Spread Says
The spread is more helpful than the average. High-scoring reviews praise the combat, visual style, weapon customization, and sense of classic adventure. Middle reviews usually like the same pieces but argue that time travel, dungeon complexity, or story ambition never fully catches up.
That pattern matters because it tells you who will love the game. If you value polished fundamentals over novelty, the 82 average may feel right. If you buy action adventures for intricate puzzles or a deeply reactive world, you may understand the positive score but personally land lower.
Buyer Translation
OpenCritic’s Strong rating supports a buy recommendation for classic action-RPG fans, especially players who like old-school Zelda structure, Square Enix HD-2D style, and build experimentation through Magicite. It does not erase the need to check platform performance or demo feel.
The smartest buyer move is still to try the Prologue Demo first. If the movement, combat, Faie chatter, and map style click there, the review consensus suggests the full game is worth serious consideration.
FAQ
What is OpenCritic score?
The June 24, 2026 snapshot showed an 82 Top Critic Average, 86% Critics Recommend, 78 critic reviews, and a Strong rating.
Is OpenCritic more useful than Metacritic?
It depends. OpenCritic is cleaner for overall critic mood, while Metacritic is better when you want platform-specific score differences.
Why is OpenCritic higher than some Metacritic pages?
OpenCritic’s aggregate and outlet handling differ, while Metacritic separates platform pages. Different pools can produce slightly different averages.
Does a Strong rating mean everyone likes it?
No. It means the overall critic response is positive. Reviews still repeat concerns about time-travel repetition, story pacing, and puzzle simplicity.
Should I buy based only on OpenCritic?
No. Use it as a confidence check, then test the demo and read platform-specific impressions before paying full price.